An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
Blog Article
These provisions apply to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, whether or not the transaction occurred just before its promulgation. Read more
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by regulation." It can be effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The legislation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair for the offender plus the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
In case the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only performed In the event the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence as well as petitioner company responded into the allegations as a result they were nicely aware about the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to generally be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), clearly distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion consists of a transfer to your higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, within the other hand, presents financial relief by putting an employee in a very higher spend scale, without switching their work duties or position. It is a mechanism designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained while in the same pay scale for an extended time, particularly when they deficiency options for promotion. Upgradation is usually a policy Instrument used to reduce the hardship of extended-term stagnation. Read more
Since the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been reached, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
During the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court may be the highest court while in the United States. Decreased courts over the federal level contain the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, plus the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related to your United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that require parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each state has its personal judicial system that involves trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Each individual state is commonly referred to given that the “supreme” court, although there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the Ny Court of Appeals or even the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, While state courts could also generally listen to cases involving federal laws.
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is often a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents in the boy or girl tend not to read more approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they will do if they can Lower off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman who's a major, the few is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who offers these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by regulation.
Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common law, is really a regulation that is based on precedents, that could be the judicial decisions from previous cases, somewhat than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case law uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Will you be looking for Court Information? You should utilize our site to search for a case or search for any person. Information over the site is updated every 24 hours at three:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found around the search site is provided for use as reference material and isn't the official court record.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 of your Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does supply for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established through the government.
Problems or Errors Should you encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a negative link or simply a portion of an opinion lacking), please notify the eService Center.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may possibly request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more